4 Comments

It might help to map the areas with power still out from Fiona, to map out areas that have frequent ongoing power outages, to map the areas last to power up after Maria. Maps help inform and communicate priority areas to propose funding support and organization (people to work on it) to establish solar microgrids in those areas first. That would help draw attention to starting the new energy system with the big goal of getting started, with or without the cooperation of the utility.

I think the hardest part of changing what's done now is actually getting started. It's sensible to get going on it as an emergency where it's needed most, to demonstrate progress, and then replicate what works in other areas on the priorities map. With or without the cooperation of the utility-- this is, after all, an emergency that calls for rapid response.

Expand full comment

Yes, I agree with you on microgrids. The Puerto Rican rebuilding problem could have microgrids of solar that are owned by the utility, kind of like solar farms.

Expand full comment

I'm not sure the people of Puerto Rico can depend on the utility to solve their problems with such a long track record of non-responsiveness or opposition. I'm looking forward to read a series, "Power by the People: Clean Energy from the Grassroots" this week from Canary Media that appears to reinforce what I was thinking about how to make Puerto Rico's energy system better, not depending on the utility to make change happen.

Expand full comment

Ms. Santiago's concern about having more decentralized power generation in Puerto Rico can easily be explained. Roof top solar, once purchased, is usually owned by the person who has it on their roof. Because the Utility, Luma, would not own it, they could no longer Profit from this expenditure; and would therefore be opposed to spending money (a lot which comes from FEMA at this time) on it. It is important, says Ms. Santiago, to decentralize there to avoid repetitive hurricane power system damage.

Expand full comment